2027 Rossignol Soul 92 Skis

Model Year	Product Page	Ski Test Results	Chairlift Chat
2027	2027 Rossignol Soul 92 Skis—Skis with bindings	2027 Rossignol Soul 92	2027 Rossignol Soul 92 & 92 W On Snow Ski Review

tester:

Ability: Advanced
Height: 6'2"
Weight: 225
Days / Year: 110ish
Age: 48
Years Skiing: 38

A bit more rigid than I used to be but still trying to be dynamic, smooth, and fluid with varying degrees of success. Skis on the snow, these days.

Ski:

2027 Rossignol Soul 92 Skis

Size Tested:

182 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Skied at Waterville in NH in a snowy day, and at Stowe on a similar snowy day--all sorts of terrain and snow conditions.

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

This is the right length for me. It's the longest one, and I don't think I'd want to go shorter because they're pretty light.

Scores

Floatation:6/10

Stability:6/10

Quickness:9/10

Playfulness:8/10

Forgiveness:8/10

Edge Grip:6/10

Versatility:7/10

Overall:7/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

Overall this is a very well-rounded ski with a pleasant disposition and a nice character. It doesn't stand out in terms of power or demand, but it's got some kick to the rear of the ski that makes it feel like a high end product.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

At 92 mm underfoot, this is an all-terrain, all-conditions ski for sure. It worked great in choppy snow, although there are sturdier skis. It worked fine on groomers, but again, some skis make it feel a bit lighter duty.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

This ski is squarely in the advanced category, but it can dip into both intermediate and expert realms with ease depending on the skier.

Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?

The Soul 92 is a great bump ski, works good in trees, and is an easy and predictable carver. One of the more well-rounded new skis this year!

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

Lauren Morton

Ability: Expert
Height: 5’4”
Weight: 130
Days / Year: 30
Age: 37
Years Skiing: 30+

Happy to ski any terrain and like to make turns

Ski:

2027 Rossignol Soul 92 Skis

Size Tested:

174 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Perry Merril with groomed, packed pow.

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

I was intimidated by the 174 length but they definitely skied shorter and I enjoyed the length.

Scores

Floatation:8/10

Stability:9/10

Quickness:10/10

Playfulness:10/10

Forgiveness:8/10

Edge Grip:9/10

Versatility:10/10

Overall:10/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

It’s early in the day but I love this ski. I was intimidated by the weight and the length but was pleasantly surprised at how quick and responsive they were. They held an edge and quickly transitioned between big and short turns.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

These are definitely an all mountain ski. I would take these from the groomers right off to the the trees and bumps.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

An approachable ski for a strong intermediate skier and above. I would recommend a shorter length for the strong intermediate.

Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?

Love this one! It matched my outfit which is always a plus!

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

Kyle Phillips

Ability: Advanced
Height: 5'9"
Weight: 210
Days / Year: 80-100
Age: 43
Years Skiing: 25 years

Controlled and Aggressive, side hit glory

Ski:

2027 Rossignol Soul 92 Skis

Size Tested:

174 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Stowe, Perry Merrill, dust on crust.

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

I sized down but if you want a stiffer ski for steeper terrain size up, not down.

Scores

Floatation:7/10

Stability:7/10

Quickness:7/10

Playfulness:7/10

Forgiveness:6/10

Edge Grip:6/10

Versatility:7/10

Overall:8/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

The ski was light, playful and held an edge well.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

This ski is your one ski quiver. It can handle it all.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

The Soul Sender 92 is for intermediate to expert. Intermediate skiers size down and advanced/experts size up. When sizing down the ski is more forgiving and playful. Sizing up will get you a playful and stable ski that wants to go fast.

Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?

When everyone is talking about ski quivers, meet the quiver killer.

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

Jose Darias

Ability: I'm A Pro
Height: 5'10"
Weight: 175
Days / Year: 100+
Age: 32
Years Skiing: 30

Fluid, powerful and charging; looking for natural takeoffs on freeride features

Ski:

2027 Rossignol Soul 92 Skis

Size Tested:

182 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Very variable, mostly hard snow. Went over to Nose Dive from the gondola. Boosting side hits and hunting the soft piles of snow in between the ice moguls.

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

This feels pretty true to length, maybe a touch long. It’s the right length for me.

Scores

Floatation:6/10

Stability:8/10

Quickness:7/10

Playfulness:6/10

Forgiveness:7/10

Edge Grip:8/10

Versatility:8/10

Overall:8/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

This is a really versatile all mountain ski with good carving capabilities. The ski feels strong and powerful when driven from the front on edge but makes turns with a more relaxed feeling that doesn’t require you to be super locked in for every turn. It’s not the most playful shape considering its rocker profile, shape and mount point but it is quite maneuverable when you ski it from a more neutral stance. It carves well for a mid 90 waist and while we don’t have much soft snow for the rest this year, it’s rocker profile suggests it’ll float over new snow pretty well.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

The Soul 92 is a true all mountain ski that you can ski just about anywhere and have a good time. Groomers, trees, steeps, moguls, cliffs, packed powder, spring skiing… it all works for the Soul 92. It may not excel in any one terrain type but it is more that sufficient at all of them.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

Intermediate to advanced skiers will get the most out of this ski but even beginners will find the ski approachable enough to progress their skills while skiing it.

Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?

Super well rounded, very capable without being punishing or hard to ski.

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

John McLaughlin

Ability: Expert
Height: 5'11"'
Weight: 170
Days / Year: 70+ but I just retired
Age: 68
Years Skiing: 55

Boring. I don't do anything exciting. I just get down making turns. I do like to go fast, but my feet rarely leave the snow.

Ski:

2027 Rossignol Soul 92 Skis

Size Tested:

182 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Perry Merrill, Liftline: frozen granular.

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

True to size.

Scores

Floatation:7/10

Stability:9/10

Quickness:8/10

Playfulness:8/10

Forgiveness:8/10

Edge Grip:9/10

Versatility:9/10

Overall:8/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

Great all mountain ski that really holds a carved turn. It really grabs.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

Great on cruisers but I would feel comfortable skiing everywhere and any thing.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

This is an advanced skiers ski. Would make a good 1 ski quiver ski.

Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?

I was surprised by how playful it was and how well it held an edge on a carved turn. Tough day to rate floatiness.

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

Nate Sugiyama

Ability: Advanced
Height: 5'8"''
Weight: 145
Days / Year: 10
Age: 35
Years Skiing: 12 years

Laid-back

Ski:

2027 Rossignol Soul 92 Skis

Size Tested:

174 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Varied terrain.

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

True to length. Would choose again.

Scores

Floatation:8/10

Stability:9/10

Quickness:9/10

Playfulness:8/10

Forgiveness:8/10

Edge Grip:7/10

Versatility:7/10

Overall:8/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

Fun, engaging, ski. Quick edge to edge turns with ease locking in and holding a variety of turns.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

Great on and off piste. A fun all mountain ski.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

Intermediate to advanced. Responds well to confident inputs.

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

Emily Sampson

Ability: Expert
Height: 5'7"
Weight: 155
Days / Year: 8/12/2026
Age: 39
Years Skiing: 34

Ex ski racer/ski coach learning to have fun again

Ski:

2027 Rossignol Soul 92 Skis

Size Tested:

174 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Frozen granular, pond ice.

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

This skied way shorter so you could size it up a bit if you wanted.

Scores

Floatation:7/10

Stability:7/10

Quickness:8/10

Playfulness:9/10

Forgiveness:7/10

Edge Grip:7/10

Versatility:8/10

Overall:7/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

This is a super fun ski, playful and quick. I felt like I was on a slalom ski and skied about 5 cm shorter than it is. I could see her skiing down a trail, popping into the woods and back out through some moguls. This ski did hold an edge but slipped a bit with aggressive pressure so someone who is a little lighter on their skis may find this more enjoyable.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

This ski felt comfy on the hard stuff today but I think she could be happier on packed powder.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

Beginner/intermediate or an older advanced.

Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?

She was a fun party gal!

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

Jamie Morris

Ability: Expert
Height: 5'10"
Weight: 175
Days / Year: 60
Age: 48
Years Skiing: 43

Fast and smooth

Ski:

2027 Rossignol Soul 92 Skis

Size Tested:

182 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Stowe gondola, variable and firm.

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

I may have preferred this ski one size up. However, the 177 did handle full speed with no chatter.

Scores

Floatation:6/10

Stability:8/10

Quickness:8/10

Playfulness:9/10

Forgiveness:8/10

Edge Grip:8/10

Versatility:7/10

Overall:8/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

A really fun one ski quiver ski.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

All mountain with sidecountry and a little snow.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

Advanced intermediate to a one ski quiver expert.

Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?

These skis were turnier than expected for the width.

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

E.V. Hamilton

Ability: Advanced
Height: 5’6
Weight: 115
Days / Year: ~30 or more depending on the season
Age: 37
Years Skiing: 30

Fast, carving, I grew up ski racing.

Ski:

2027 Rossignol Soul 92 Skis

Size Tested:

174 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Stowe, hardpack.

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

The Rossignol Soul felt true to size.

Scores

Floatation:7/10

Stability:8/10

Quickness:4/10

Playfulness:5/10

Forgiveness:5/10

Edge Grip:8/10

Versatility:7/10

Overall:8/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

My first impression of the Rossignol Soul 92 was that it felt long, directional, and built to go fast and straight.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

The Rossignol Soul is suited for open terrain and groomers, with a preference for higher speeds and longer turns rather than tight, technical skiing.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

A more directional, performance-oriented ski that favors a confident, advanced skier who is comfortable driving the front of the ski and skiing at speed. Less suited for beginners.

Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?

This ski felt very straight and directional, and definitely prefers to go fast. It requires more effort to initiate turns and feels most comfortable when driven from the front of the boot, which naturally puts you in a strong, forward stance—something I really personally liked. That said, it’s not the easiest ski to turn and feels less intuitive at slower speeds or in tighter terrain. It really comes alive when you open it up and let it run. Overall, a powerful, speed-oriented ski that rewards an aggressive skier, but likely not the best fit for beginners or those looking for something more playful or forgiving.

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

steve sulin

Ability: Advanced
Height: 5'10"
Weight: 250
Days / Year: 12

lazy

Ski:

2027 Rossignol Soul 92 Skis

Size Tested:

182 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Deer Valley.

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

Skis true to size.

Scores

Floatation:6/10

Stability:8/10

Quickness:7/10

Playfulness:7/10

Forgiveness:7/10

Edge Grip:8/10

Versatility:8/10

Overall:10/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

Very easy to ski from the start.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

Very fun ski for all conditions. Easy to ski on everything.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

A intermediate to expert skier will enjoy this ski.

Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?

.

Read the Full Ski Test →

Jeff submitted 2 test cards — select one:

tester:

Jeff Neagle

Ability: Expert
Height: 5'10"
Weight: 165
Days / Year: 120-140
Age: 40
Years Skiing: 38

Flowing and Kind of Fast with Freestyle/Freeski Influence

Ski:

2027 Rossignol Soul 92 Skis

Size Tested:

182 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Pico, VT. Mostly groomers, but some variable conditions and terrain.

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

Skis true to size in my opinion. I like this length with the amount of rocker it has.

Scores

Floatation:6/10

Stability:7/10

Quickness:8/10

Playfulness:7/10

Forgiveness:8/10

Edge Grip:6/10

Versatility:8/10

Overall:7/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

I think the Soul 92 is a nice addition for Rossignol. It complements the Soul 102 as it's basically the same ski, just narrower, which they never really had before. They perform similarly too, which makes sense. It's not the strongest ski overall, but stronger than you might expect given its shape and width. It's obviously trying to be a versatile, fun, relatively playful all-mountain ski before a powerful charger, but it might surprise you in how fast you can ski it without it losing composure. Not the most dynamic on a groomer, but very fun in bumps, trees, and any kind of playful terrain.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

If you're the type of skier who likes to seek out challenging terrain, trees, bumps, etc rather than just cruising groomers, you'll love the Soul 92. That's definitely its sweet spot, which is supported by the fact that the Arcade skis are so good on groomers. If you prefer staying mostly on trail, or if you prefer a shape that's more associated with responsiveness and precision on a groomer, you'll prefer the Arcade 94, but that ski doesn't have the off trail versatility of the Soul 92. In other words, it's pretty easy to differentiate and choose between the two when it comes to Rossignol.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

I think it's perfectly fine for an intermediate. Not too hard to ski, not too tiring, and overall pretty approachable. On the other hand, an expert who prefers staying off trail (I think of someone like Bob) will also really enjoy its performance.

Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?

I really like that Rossignol is slightly simplifying their collection and the naming of their skis moving into 2027. Helps myself and likely other skiers better understand the intention of each of their skis.

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

Jeff Neagle

Ability: Expert
Height: 5'10"
Weight: 165
Days / Year: 120-140
Age: 40
Years Skiing: 38

Flowing and Kind of Fast with Freestyle/Freeski Influence

Ski:

2027 Rossignol Soul 92 Skis

Size Tested:

182 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

Waterville Valley, a mix of packed powder groomers and a little bit of soft snow on ungroomed slopes.

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

It skis a little short due to the shape, but not very short. I liked the 182 length.

Scores

Floatation:6/10

Stability:7/10

Quickness:8/10

Playfulness:7/10

Forgiveness:7/10

Edge Grip:6/10

Versatility:7/10

Overall:7/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

The new Soul 92 is a very useful all-mountain ski. To me, it feels best for someone who likes quicker turns, probably stays on the sides of trails whenever possible, seeks out bumps and trees, and is an adventurous skier. It does feel like a narrower version of the 102 and I think it's nice to have a ski in the collection that offers similar performance in a narrower width. Another good way to think about it is it's basically the opposite of the Arcade 94 when it comes to its preferences. The Arcade just wants to carve, while the Soul doesn't excel at carving and rather wants to make those shorter, quicker, more skidded turns.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

Like I said, I really think it's best for someone who's seeking out off-piste terrain, skis the sides of the trails looking for the best snow, etc. Doesn't feel like a groomer ripper, but it's very fun in the right situations.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

I think it's fairly approachable for an intermediate, which is nice. The sweet spot feels like an emerging advanced skier who wants to start exploring new terrain, or an experienced advanced or expert skier who knows they want a quicker, more off-piste focused ski like this.

Anything else you want to tell us about your experience on these skis?

Going back to the two ski comparison, I'm more of an Arcade skier these days, but the Soul 92 is a lot of fun!

Read the Full Ski Test →

tester:

Rob Cunliffe

Ability: Advanced
Height: 6’2”
Weight: 190
Days / Year: 35
Age: 39
Years Skiing: 30 years

Like a wave: smooth, with a mind of its own, driven by the powers of the moon and universe, and ultimately… crashing.

Ski:

2027 Rossignol Soul 92 Skis

Size Tested:

182 CM

Location, Terrain, Snow Conditions Notes

I skied this on a chopped up afternoon of a hardback groomer day at Pico.

Did this length feel short, long, or just right? Would you recommend sizing up or down, or does it ski "true to size?" Would you choose this length for yourself?

This length felt right for me, at 6'2" tall.

Scores

Floatation:7/10

Stability:7/10

Quickness:6/10

Playfulness:6/10

Forgiveness:6/10

Edge Grip:6/10

Versatility:6/10

Overall:5/10

What's your first impression of this ski? How did it feel?

Planky and clanky. This ski felt like it had a nice even flex. It was approachable and maneuverable. It was mostly forgiving, but entirely uninteresting to me. The tails felt cumbersome somehow, like they kept clacking together behind me. I found it boring as bread pudding.

For what type of terrain would you recommend this ski? Why does it perform well in that terrain?

It's an all mountain free-ride ski for sure. It handled the chop and mess of a groomer day afternoon just fine, but I didn't feel like it performed WELL at anything. Perhaps I get too much of my skiing style from the ski, instead of channeling it from within. Or perhaps I am being too philosophical. Or perhaps, this ski was just uninteresting. But a top choice in it's class for me.

What's the appropriate ability level and/or style for this ski? Why is it appropriate for that type of skier?

Anyone but a complete and total beginner would handle this okay. At 92mm wide, it's a good approachable build, width, and flex. Handles just about anything you put to it. For more adventurous skiers who want a lively ride and a ski that gives something back to them, matching their energy turn for turn, I might look elsewhere.

Read the Full Ski Test →

2027 Rossignol Soul 92 Skis

Why we like it:

Who it's for:

Highlights:

Things to consider:

Fit & sizing considerations:

Reviews

Q&A

Learn more about the Rossignol Soul 92

SIMILAR PRODUCTS